Conclusion: it has nothing to do with the image, and everything to do with the discrimination of those that promote and enjoy child sexuality; that includes the kids themselves.
Conclusion: it has nothing to do with the image, and everything to do with the discrimination of those that promote and enjoy child sexuality; that includes the kids themselves.Tags: single dating websiteresearch paper on interracial datingsaudi arabian dating marriage sitemidnight ride datingEgy free sex web cam14c datingFree cam to cam chat fuck sex one on one
From 1960 attempts were made to distinguish “homosexuals” from people then dubbed “paedophiliacs”.
In popular usage, the word paedophilia conflates sexual attraction to prepubescent children with “child sexual abuse”.
Heretic TOC recently discussed additional un-prosecuted “child pornography” in the public domain.
It also flagged circumcision and the curious failure to prosecute the genital mutilation of some 10,000 and 1,000,000 male babies in the UK and the US, respectively, annually.
In relating the anger expressed over the murder of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, Peter Herman in Heretic TOC highlighted the following bitter irony: “It has come to a point where, in many parts of the English speaking world, any image of youthful sexuality and even written descriptions of it will at the very least ostracize the individual, land him in jail or possibly get him killed.” Endlösung der Pädophilenfrage – Final Solution to the Paedophile Question But why is war on minor-attracted individuals waged?
Why have those elected to protect the civil liberties of every citizen, failed to do so for members of this group?
Jurors and justices who use it as part of their everyday language are trusted to know it when they see it.’ Yet ‘scientific surveys, parliamentary debates and jury verdicts demonstrate no measure of consensus either about community standards or the sort of material which infringes them.’ It seems to me far from self-evident that photographs necessarily involve exploitation in their making, especially as regards those at the lower end of the scale, in COPINE classes 1-6. Taking a shotgun approach, the Panel opts to assume the worst and blast away regardless.” “Shotgun approach” indeed.
Indeed, the Sentencing Advisory Panel concedes this point by saying: ‘Images that are relatively less harmful … Fifteen years on, governments still blast away with their bullets to the point where free expression and free speech is critically riddled with holes.
Any child daring to display natural sexuality will be instantly hermetically sealed within a bubble of suppression, any adult moving a hand to break the bubble, ostracised.
This from Moor Larkin: “Look after the children, the idea seems to go, and then by the time they see all this filth and perversion, they will be adults and thus impervious to any of its pernicious effects.