As a radioactive particle decays, it progresses through a well know set of elements and isotopes, emitting Beta or Alpha particles of given Me V (Million electron Volts).
When alpha particles are emitted by a radioactive speck in a given substrate or material, the alpha particles "run out of energy" a certain distance away from the core and leave a "damage" sphere or ring (when cross-sectioned). By measuring the diameter of the damaged ring, and also noting the various rings around a core, its fairly straightforward to determine what the exact center core particle was to begin with.
Each halo ring is identified by the appropriate isotope and its alpha energy in Me V (Million electron Volts)Idealized three-dimensional illustration of a 218 Po halo obtained by slicing the halo through the center.
Each halo ring is identified by the appropriate isotope and its alpha energy in Me V (Million electron Volts) Robert Gentry, a government laboratory researcher discovered that many halos were caused by original (not secondary) particles of Polonium 210 (210Po), Polonium 214 and Polonium 218.
Reviewing: By it is easily possible to accurately determine what the composition was of the original radioactive material encased in the substrate.
Following are some illustrations of Polonium halos and photographs of actual cross-sections of halos of those isotopes.The first option can only have come about through instantaneous creation.The second at some later event (such as the Fall of Adam) at which time the death causing process of radioactivity on earth may have begun.Furthermore, the offspring of cross specie types are always sterile (such as the mule, an offspring of a horse and donkey or the offspring of one type of dolphin mating with another type of dolphin.).The second most compelling evidence for instantaneous creation pertains to the spherical halos caused by the decay of a radioactive core.Following are a number of arguments why the Theory of Evolution (and that's all it is) cannot be correct, and why Creation has to be correct.More extensive evidence, largely ignored or brushed over by most of the agnostic scientific community, is contained in the excellent book Abstract: If an animal mates with another animal not of its exact species, the result will be a sterile creature (e.g. It would have to find a sexually compatible mate who was also fertile during its relatively miniscule life span on the overall evolutionary time scale.But we don't see any missing links to speak of, or creatures in transition.(Once in a while some "scientist" will speculate and publish some "finding" which is generally discarded later) When we find a mutant in the higher level creatures, it is nearly always sterile.Yet we have tens of thousands of the higher orders of species with perfectly matched sexually sets of males and females.And any deviations from a normal union and offspring is sterile (not capable of reproduction). How could evolutionary processes possibly explain what we see all around us today?